For as long as the web and test development have enjoyed the patronage of the Browserling, it has been a crucial and thriving instrument. Similarly, with any other service, consumers may switch for different motives just the same. Whatever it is, price-performance ratio, adding features or making certain pivots, people do find it not unusual when looking for a Browserling alternative. In the text below, we examine what is a worthy choice to substitute Browserling with, taking various options and details that influence this decision into account.
Being aware of the importance of those alternatives is part of the smart approach towards reducing waste.
It is worth mentioning that one should be cognizant and well aware of their reasons for considering alternatives before considering the same. Though Browserling is known as trustworthy its drawbacks may not meet user’s expectations. Various, pricing structures, features available, compatibility, and customer support are a few of the elements that may set an alternative in customers’ minds to search for.
Criteria for evaluating alternatives
- Feature set
What is the alternative’s basis in features of web development and testing? A bundle of the aforementioned products can be considered as compatibility with the main browsers, debugging tools, and the opportunity to take screenshots and more.
- Ease of use
How good at answering the user’s needs is the user interface of the alternative? Whether or not project team members, such as developers and testers, can easily get around the platform is something to be answered by the question. How well do they complete the tasks?
- Compatibility and integration
Is the proposed alternative in line with the software and guidelines in use during the implementation process? Smooth connection with the current work processes should be of the highest priority otherwise productivity will inevitably decrease.
- Cost
Browserling alternative’s prices differ. Furthermore, it is crucial to make a comparison of the cost-effectiveness of each choice and weigh it against the available budget.
- Performance
Do the alternatives give similar stable results? Waterfalls and performance failures may break the workflow and threaten project deadlines.
Key Browserling alternatives
Test sigma
Testsigma is a cloud-based cross-browser testing platform which enables users to perform automated and manual testing across multiple browsers and operating systems is a platform. It provides functionalities like immediate testing, screenshot testing and integrations with the most-used continuous integration/continuous delivery software.
Cross Browser Testing
CrossBrowserTesting is a robust tool which consists of various testing components such as live testing, automated testing, and visual testing. It provides a lot of options in the form of browsers and devices that can be used for testing, accompanied by integrations such as Selenium and Jenkins.
Browser Stack
BrowserStack provides a cloud-based testing service with the ability to work along over 2,000 real devices and browsers. It comes with features like live testing, automated testing, debugging tools etc as well and it integrates with popular development frameworks and tools.
Sauce Labs
Sauce Lab is a cloud-based testing lab that consists of several automated testing features along with live testing and virtual device testing. It covers various browsers and operating systems and allows integrations with CI/CD tools and test frameworks most commonly used.
Conclusion
Although Browserling has been the top pick for web development and testing applications, some users might find it quite useful to experiment and use some of the alternatives that can better respond to their discrete demands. By obtaining criteria like feature set, ease of use, compatibility, cost, and performance, end users will assess which Browserling alternative will be most suitable for their needs.
